More often than not, the problem, in the final analysis, is firmed up and addressed on a case-to-case basis the nature, structure and aim of the law itself is often resorted to in looking at the legislative intent. [3/3] aquilino q pimentel jr, petitioner, vs hon alexander aguirre in his capacity as executive secretary, hon emilia boncodin in her capacity as secretary of the department of budget and management, respondents. Case digest of llamzares v comelec (main decision) vena v verga 1 mary grace poe-llamanzares vs comelec et al gr no 221697 facts: grace poe (poe) was found abandoned in a church in jaro iloilo sometime 1968. Case of hebron vs reyes: 1959] reference digest 139 of villena v secretary of interior, in the case of mondano v szlvos, the court anuulled the order of suspension authorized by the president dwelling on the distinction between the words supervision and control and on the scope of the power of the pres-. Republic of the philippines supreme court manila en banc gr no l-7708 may 30, 1955 jose mondano, petitioner, vs fernando silvosa, provincial governor of surigao, jose arreza and olimpio epis, members of the provincial board, respondents.
Revolution films 303 likes revolution films is one of the longest standing, most reputable and prolific production companies in the united kingdom. “this presidential power of control over the executive branch of government extends over all executive officers from cabinet secretary to the lowliest clerk and has been held by us, in the landmark case of mondano vs silvosa to mean ‘the power of [the president] to alter or modify or nullify or set aside what a subordinate officer had done. Laurel v garcia 187 scra 797 facts: the subject roppongi property is one of the properties acquired by the philippines from japan pursuant to a reparations agreement. Eastern shipping lines, inc, petitioner, vs philippine overseas employment administration (poea), minister of labor and employment, hearing officer abdul basar and kathleen d saco, respondents.
Lonzanida vs comelec [311 scra 602] issue: won petitioner’s assumption of office as mayor of san antonio zambales from may 1995 to 1998 may be considered as service of one full term for the (local government, disqualification: exception to the 3 term limit rule) purpose of applying the three-term limit for elective local government officials. Article vii [executive department] section 17 the president shall have control of all the executive departments, bureaus, a. Case digests and scratch notes home about statutory construction case digests ii chapter 6 aboitiz shipping corp v city of cebu issue: whether or not an appeal of cases involving just compensation should be made first by darab before rtc under sec 57. Mondano vs silvosa, etc, et al conviction by ﬁnal judgment must precede the ﬁling by the provincial governor of the charges and trial by the provincial board. The assistant executive secretory indorsed the complaint for rape and concubinage against mondano, duly elected and qualified mayor of mainit, surigao,to silvosa, provincial governor of suriga, for immediate investigation, appropriate action and report.
Narratives (berne guerrero) 349 duterte vs sandiganbayan [gr 130191, 27 april 1998] third division, kapunan (j): 3 concur facts: in 1990, the davao city local automation project was launched by the city government of davao the goal of said project was to make davao city a leading center for computer systems and technology. Case digest constitutional law election law gr no 157013 july 10 2003 macalintal vs comelec political law republic act no 9189 suffrage this site is created to post case digests of supreme court rulings and other laws in the philippines for the purpose of giving aid to law students other useful resources are also posted here. In mondano v silvosa, in a more recent case, drilon v lim, the difference between control and supervision was further delineated officers in control lay down the rules in the performance or accomplishment of an act under existing law, local government units, in addition to having administrative autonomy in the exercise of. Mario cv jalandoni, petitioner, vs hon (mondano vs silvosa, 97 phil 143, 148 (1955) and this is defined in the case of republic vs villarama, jr  which held that for an abuse to be grave the power is exercised in an arbitrary or despotic manner by reason of passion or personal hostility. Pubcorp cases: 1 philippine society v coa (gr no 169752) 2 limbona v mangelin (gr no 80391) 3 magtajas v pryce corporation (234 scra 255) 4 laguna lake v.
Supreme court manila en banc gr no l-7708 may 30, 1955 jose mondano, petitioner, vs fernando silvosa, provincial governor of surigao, jose arreza and olimpio. In mondano vs silvosa, sc held that supervision means overseeing or the power or authority of an officer to see that subordinate officers perform their duties if the latter fail or neglect to fulfill them, the former may take such action or step as prescribed by law to make them perform their duties. Administrative law case doctrines administrative law case doctrines by olive cachapero in the landmark case of mondano vs silvosa, to mean the power of [the president] to alter or modify or nullify or set aside what a subordinate officer had done in the performance of his duties and to substitute the judgment of the former.
Case digest (transportation law): kilusang mayo uno vs garcia kilusang mayo uno labor center vshon jesus b garcia, jr, the land transportation franchising and regulatory board, and the provincial bus operators association of the philippines gr no 115381 december 23, 1994. Gr no l-46218 october 23, 1990 joventino madrigal,â petitioner-appellant,â vs prov gov aristeo m lecaroz, vice-governor celso zoleta, jr, provincial board. Jose mondano, petitioner, vs fernando silvosa, provincial governor of surigao, jose arreza and olimpio epis, members of the provincial board, respondents d avila and c h lozada for petitioner olimpio r epis in his own behalf and for his co-respondents. Republic of the philippines supreme court manila en banc gr no l-7708 may 30, 1955 jose mondano, petitioner, vs fernando silvosa, provincial governor of.
In the landmark case of mondano vs silvosa, the power of control means “the power of the president to alter or modify or nullify or set aside what a subordinate officer had done in the performance of his duties and to substitute the judgment of the former with that of the latter. Mondano vs silvosa ganzon vs ca, 200 scra 271 (1991) 13 what is the nature of the power of the secretary of justice to review the constitutionality or legality of tax ordinance and revenue measures.